Shout Out: Join Michael D.J. Eisenberg at the 2025 ABA Techshow - Unlock the Power of Video Marketing for Legal Success πŸš€

Join Your Award-Winning The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Blogger and Podcaster Michael D.J. Eisenberg and co-presenter Patrick Wright at the 2025 ABA Techshow session on β€œHow to Leverage Video to Build Your Brand, Dominate SEO, and Attract The Best Clients!”

Discover how to transform your law firm's online presence with video marketing! Learn proven strategies to boost SEO, attract ideal clients, and leverage AI tools like ChatGPT for content optimization. Empower your brand across platforms like TikTok, YouTube, and Facebook with actionable insights from legal tech experts Michael D.J. Eisenberg and Patrick Wright. 🌟

The session will be on April 3, 2025, at 10:30 AM CDT.

Hope to see YOU there!

Shout Out: Unlock AI's Potential with Ethics Expertise πŸš€πŸ’»

Keep up with the constant changing world of AI and Legal ethics!

In the rapidly evolving legal landscape, embracing artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer optionalβ€”it's essential 🌟. The upcoming AI and Legal Ethics: A Risk-Benefit Analysis 2025 webinar offers a unique opportunity for lawyers to enhance their practice while navigating the complex ethical considerations surrounding AI use πŸ“š. Join Hilary P. Gerzhoy and Julienne Pasichow of HWG LLP delve into critical areas such as competence in technology, supervision of AI tools, reasonable fees, confidentiality, truth in advertising, and client communication standards πŸ“Š.

By attending this webinar, you'll gain practical insights into integrating AI responsibly, ensuring compliance with professional conduct standards, and staying ahead in the legal tech revolution πŸš€. Whether you're looking to improve efficiency, enhance client services, or simply stay updated on the latest legal tech trends, this event is a must-attend for any forward-thinking lawyer πŸš€.

You can attend this information packed cle virtually!

Don't miss out! Register now and elevate your legal practice with AI expertise πŸ’»πŸ‘‰ https://dcbar.inreachce.com/Details/Information/11092a42-cde2-426d-9dbf-25f270b2df09

I hope to β€œvirtually” see you there!

Shout Out! Your Award-Winning Blogger and Podcaster will be Presenting at the 2025 ABA Techshow!

The Aba techshow is the place to be for the intersection of technology and the practice of law - tech will not replace you but if you don’t use the right tech in your practice you could be left behind by those who do!

Hey everyone! Next week, I’ll be co-presenting with ABA Techshow Co-Chair Patrick Wright!

We’ll be presenting on β€œInnovations in Client Intake: Leveraging Technology for Better Outcomes” and β€œHow to Leverage Video to Build Your Brand, Dominate SEO, and Attract the Best Clients.”

I can’t wait to see everyone there! Remember, if you tell me at the conference that you follow The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page and The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast, I’ll send you a free The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Mug!*

* Limit one per person: Previous recipients from any prior appearance or as a guest on The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast are not eligible for to receive an additional mug. Sorry!

MTC: βš–οΈ ChatGPT and the Supreme Court: Two Years of Progress in Legal AI βš–οΈ

What can we learn about the evolution of generative aI in its ever growing analysis of the supreme court?

Ed Bershitskiy’s recent SCOTUSblog article, β€œWe’re not there to provide entertainment. We’re there to decide cases,” offers a compelling analysis of how ChatGPT has evolved since its launch in 2023, particularly in its application to Supreme Court-related questions. The article highlights both the successes and shortcomings of AI models, providing valuable insights for legal professionals navigating this rapidly advancing technology.

In 2023, the original ChatGPT model answered only 42% of Supreme Court-related questions correctly, often producing fabricated facts aka β€œhallucinations” and errors. Fast forward to 2025, newer models like GPT-4o, o3-mini, and o1 have demonstrated significant improvements. For instance, o1 answered an impressive 90% of questions correctly, showcasing enhanced accuracy and nuanced understanding of complex legal concepts such as non-justiciability and the counter-majoritarian difficulty. Krantz’s analysis also underscores the importance of verifying AI outputs, as even advanced models occasionally produce mistakes or hallucinations.

Always Check Your Work When Using Generative AI - It Can Create Hallucinations!

🚨

Always Check Your Work When Using Generative AI - It Can Create Hallucinations! 🚨

The article compares three distinct AI models: GPT-4o is detail-oriented but prone to overreach; o3-mini is concise but often incomplete; and o1 strikes a balance between depth and precision. This comparison is particularly relevant for legal professionals seeking tools tailored to their needs. For example, GPT-4o excels at generating detailed narratives and tables, while o1 is ideal for concise yet accurate responses.

Lawyers are not going to be replaced by ai but those lawyers who do not know how to use ai in their practice and mindful of its constant changes will be left behind!

Krantz also explores how the line between search engines and AI-powered tools is blurring. Unlike traditional search engines, these AI models analyze queries contextually, offering more comprehensive answers. However, legal practitioners must exercise caution when relying on AI for research or drafting to ensure ethical compliance and factual accuracy - in other words, always check your work when using AI!

As AI continues to evolve, its role in legal practice is becoming indispensable. By understanding its strengths and limitations, lawyers can leverage these tools effectively while safeguarding against potential risks. Krantz’s article provides a detailed roadmap for navigating this technological transformation in law.

PS: I can’t stress enough to always check your work when using AI!

Happy Lawyering!

MTC

Shout out to Tom Martin, and His Free! LawDroid AI Conference 2025, The Year of Transformation!

join tom martin and his guests at the sure to be informative β€œLawdroid conference 2025”!

Tom Martin, a previous guest on The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast is pioneering groundbreaking innovations in legal practice through his work with LawDroid, leveraging AI to transform the industry πŸ€–πŸ’». Join his upcoming Zoom event on March 19 & 20 to explore AI-driven solutions for law professionals and learn from experts like Tom and other previous The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast guests including Nikki Black, Carolyn Elefant, Jane Reardon & Damien Riehl.

Register now! πŸ“ˆπŸ’Ό

MTC: Editorial: "Masters of Their Domain: Why Lawyers Must Control Their Firm's Online Presence" πŸ“ŠπŸ’»

Lawyers are the first line defenders of their online reputation by owning their firm’s domain name!

In today's digital age, having a strong online presence is crucial for law firms. One often overlooked aspect of this presence is their (e-mail/website) domain name ownership. Lawyers should be aware of who owns their firm's domain name, as it can have significant legal implications, especially if the firm splits or even if a solo practitioner is involved. I’d like to discuss the importance of domain name ownership, the risks associated with using website builders like Wix, Squarespace* or LawLytics and how lawyers can independently purchase and manage their domain names to ensure flexibility and security.

Importance of Domain Name Ownership

Domain names are more than just web addresses; they are valuable assets that can significantly impact a firm's identity and reputation. When a law firm splits, disputes over domain name ownership can arise, leading to potential legal battles. For instance, if one partner retains the domain name, it could cause confusion among clients and hinder the ability of other partners to establish their new practices effectively 🀝. Recently attorneys in a (former) firm in Kansas had a similar dispute that led to litigation. Thus, it is essential for lawyers to ensure they have control over their domain names from the outset.

Risks with Website Builders

Using website builders like Squarespace* or LawLytics services can simplify the process of creating a website, but it often comes with a hidden cost: potential loss of domain name ownership. When you register a domain through these platforms, you might not fully own the domain. Squarespace*, for example, acts as a middleman, facilitating domain registration but not retaining ownership πŸ“ˆ. However, if you rely solely on their services, you could face issues if you decide to switch providers. This is why it's prudent to purchase and manage your domain name independently (and likely before you go public with your site through one of these builders).

Independent Domain Name Management

Lawyers need to be savvy about using website builders and who owns the site’s domain name

To maintain control over your domain name, it's advisable to register it through a registrar like GoDaddy, hover* or Namecheap. This allows you to manage your domain settings, transfer it to different web hosts, and ensure continuity even if you change website builders πŸš€. Here’s how you can do it:

  1. Choose a Registrar: Select a reputable domain registrar where you can purchase your domain name.

  2. Register Your Domain: Ensure the domain is registered in your name with your contact information.

  3. Set Up DNS: Configure your DNS settings to point to your desired web host.

  4. Transfer if Needed: If you switch web hosts, you can easily transfer your domain without losing control.

Legal Implications

Legal implications arise when domain name ownership is not clearly established. Disputes can lead to costly legal battles, especially if cybersquatting or trademark infringement is involved 🚫. The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) provide frameworks for resolving such disputes, but prevention is always better than cure. By owning your domain name outright and from the start, you avoid potential conflicts and protect your firm's online identity.

Final Thoughts

The type of domain, .e.g., β€œ.com”, β€œ.biz”, β€œ.law”, etc., can help identify the type of business you have.

Lawyers must prioritize domain name ownership to safeguard their firm's online presence and avoid potential legal issues. By understanding the risks associated with website builders and taking steps to independently manage their domain names, lawyers can ensure they remain masters of their digital domain 🌐.

Happy Lawyering!

MTC

WOW: 🌐 DNS: The Internet's Phonebook and Why Lawyers Need to Know It! πŸ“š

πŸ›‘οΈ Protect your firm, learn your DNS πŸ›‘οΈ.

Following The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast Episode πŸŽ™οΈ Ep. 104: The Importance of Data Backup & Cybersecurity w "Mr. Backup", Curtis Preston!, I realize it might be beneficial to explain what β€œDNS” means:

Imagine you want to visit a friend's house, but instead of using their street address, you only know their name. To find their house, you would need a directory that translates names into addresses. Similarly, when you type a website's domain name into your browser, like "example.com," your computer doesn't understand it. That's where the Domain Name System (DNS) comes in, acting as a translator between human-readable domain names and computer-friendly IP addresses πŸ“Š. 

DNS is like a phonebook for the internet, converting domain names into IP addresses that computers can understand, allowing you to access websites without memorizing complex IP addresses like the one for The Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page, which would be its unique IP address if it were publicly available πŸ“ˆ.

For lawyers, understanding DNS is essential for maintaining a robust online presence, particularly when it comes to their firm's website 🌐. DNS plays a key role in website performance and security, impacting how quickly and securely clients can access legal services online πŸš€.

Why DNS Matters for Lawyers:

πŸ’Ό Lawyer by day, DNS master by night! πŸ¦Έβ€β™‚οΈ

  • Performance Optimization: Techniques like DNS prefetching can significantly improve website loading times, enhancing user experience and SEO rankings πŸ“ˆ.

  • Security: DNS security measures, such as DNS firewalls and DNSSEC, protect against cyber threats like DNS spoofing and hijacking, safeguarding client data and trust πŸ›‘οΈ.

  • Reliability: Ensuring DNS records are correctly set up, especially CNAME records for CDNs, ensures efficient content delivery and minimizes downtime πŸ“ˆ.

In today's digital age, lawyers must be aware of DNS to ensure their online platforms are both fast and secure, providing a seamless experience for potential clients 🌟. Moreover, understanding DNS can help lawyers troubleshoot common issues with their website, such as slow loading times or unexpected errors, by identifying problems in DNS resolution or configuration 🚨.

Happy Lawyering!

Shout Out to Jeff Richardson sharing how Lawyers' New Best Friend is the iPad Air (M3) Review!

Kudos to the previous Tech-Savvy Lawyer.Page Podcast guest Jeff Richardson for his insightful review of the new iPad Air (M3) πŸ“±πŸ‘! This device is a game-changer for lawyers, offering enhanced speed and features like Apple Pencil Pro support πŸ–‹οΈ. Perfect for legal professionals seeking efficiency and productivity πŸ“ˆ

Note that while I have an iPad Pro (M4) 😲, that may be a little much for the average lawyer/user. But in the end, get what fits your needs best! 😌

MTC: Navigating the Legal Landscape of DOGE: Lessons for Lawyers from Ongoing Litigation πŸš€

many are worried doge is mishandling citizens’ pii!

The recent involvement of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in accessing sensitive government databases has sparked a wave of lawsuits, raising significant concerns about data privacy and security 🚨. For lawyers, these legal challenges offer valuable insights into how to protect your clients’ personally identifiable information (PII) in light of DOGE's actions. I’d like to share some of the key takeaways from these lawsuits and explore how lawyers can apply these lessons to safeguard sensitive data, focusing on the ABA Model Rules and best practices for data protection.

Understanding the Legal Challenges:

At least a dozen lawsuits have been filed to stop DOGE from accessing tax records, student loan accounts, and other troves of personal data, often invoking the Privacy Act of 1974 πŸ“œ. Created in response to the Watergate Scandal, this law restricts the sharing of sensitive information without consent, making it a crucial tool for plaintiffs seeking to limit DOGE's access to personal data πŸ“.

Legal and Ethical Responsibilities

Lawyers have a legal duty to protect client confidentiality, as outlined in ABA Model Rule 1.6 πŸ“œ. This rule prohibits revealing information related to a client's representation unless exceptions apply, such as informed client consent or implied authorization to carry out the representation πŸ“. The duty of confidentiality extends beyond attorney-client privilege, covering all information related to the representation, regardless of its source 🌐.

Key Takeaways for Lawyers

are you ready to help protect your client'S DATA IF THE GOVERNMENT BREACHES Their pii?

  1. Privacy Act of 1974: Lawyers should be aware of the Privacy Act's provisions, which prohibit unauthorized disclosure of personal information from federal systems of records πŸ“Š. This law is being used to challenge DOGE's access to sensitive data, highlighting its importance in protecting client confidentiality 🚫.

  2. Standing and Harm: Courts have often ruled that plaintiffs must demonstrate irreparable harm to succeed in these lawsuits πŸ“. Lawyers should ensure that their clients can establish a clear risk of harm if seeking injunctive relief against similar data access efforts 🚨.

  3. Data Security Protocols: The lawsuits emphasize the need for robust data security measures to prevent unauthorized access. Lawyers should implement strong encryption and access controls to protect client data, as suggested by ABA Formal Opinion 483, which emphasizes the duty to notify clients of data breaches and take reasonable steps to safeguard confidential information πŸ”’.

  4. Compliance with Data Protection Regulations: Beyond the Privacy Act, lawyers must comply with other data protection laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) 🌎. Ensuring compliance with these regulations can help prevent unauthorized disclosures and maintain client trust πŸ“¨.

  5. Transparency and Consent: The lawsuits highlight the importance of transparency and consent in handling personal information. Lawyers should ensure that clients are informed about how their data is used and processed, as required by ABA Model Rule 1.4, which mandates explaining matters to the extent necessary for clients to make informed decisions regarding the representation πŸ“.

Lessons from Specific Lawsuits:

Multiple law suits have been filed to enusre doge is not misusing pii - are your client’s pii at risk?

Implementing Best Practices

To safeguard client data effectively, lawyers should:

  1. Conduct Regular Audits: Regularly review data handling practices to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and ethical standards πŸ“Š.

  2. Enhance Data Security: Implement robust data encryption and access controls to protect client information, aligning with ABA Model Rule 1.6's requirement to prevent unauthorized disclosure πŸ”’.

  3. Stay Informed: Keep up-to-date with legal developments and court rulings related to DOGE's access to sensitive data, ensuring compliance with ABA Model Rules 1.1 and 1.1[8], which requires lawyers to stay abreast of the benefits and risks associated with technology used in client services πŸ“°.

Final Thoughts

The ongoing litigation surrounding DOGE provides valuable lessons for lawyers on protecting clients and personally identifiable information. By understanding legal obligations, implementing robust data security measures, and complying with data protection regulations, lawyers can uphold the trust that is fundamental to the client-lawyer relationship πŸ’Ό.

Word (or Acronym) of the Week: Advanced Data Protection (ADP) πŸ”

Advanced Data Protection (ADP) is Apple's robust end-to-end encryption feature for iCloud data. It ensures only the account holder can access their information, including photos, notes, and backups. ADP elevates user privacy by rendering data inaccessible even to Apple itself. This heightened security measure is crucial for legal professionals handling sensitive client information. However, ADP's recent removal in the UK due to government pressure highlights the ongoing tension between data privacy and law enforcement access, prompting lawyers to reassess their digital security strategies.